Fission Vs Fusion Essay Topics

This past year has been big for nuclear fusion. First there was the announcement from Lockheed Martin claiming they could have a fusion reactor that fits in a truck. Next there is an announcement from Germany that physicists are close to finishing another fusion reactor.

I suspect that when most people read about nuclear fusion, like in this recent TIME feature on a startup called General Fusion, they just focus on the "nuclear" part. But there is a big difference between nuclear fission and nuclear fusion. Let's go over the similarities and differences.

It's All About Mass and Energy

Suppose that I had a 2 million dollars (this is clearly just a hypothetical situation). For some reason I decide to split this money two separate accounts. After doing this, I find that each account has $999,999. Yes, I am missing 2 dollars! But maybe in exchange for this missing 2 dollars, I get a whole bunch of energy. That might be ok.

This is exactly what happens with nuclear fission (fission means to break apart). If you looked at an atom, you would find it has three things: electrons, protons, and neutrons (OK, hydrogen doesn't have any neutrons). The number of protons in the nucleus tells you what element the atom is (nitrogen has 7 protons, silver has 47 protons). Then there is the atomic number atomic mass number. This tells you how many protons plus neutrons the atom has. Uranium-235 has 92 protons (because it's uranium) and 143 neutrons (because 235 - 92 = 143). Oh, one more fact for the next time you are at a party. If two atoms have the same number of protons, but different numbers of neutrons—these are isotopes (like hydrogen-1 and hydrogen-2).

But back to fission. Here is the crazy part. If you break uranium-235 into two pieces, you get krypton-92, barium-141 plus two extra neutrons. OK, that isn't crazy since all the protons and neutrons are accounted for. If you find the mass of the original uranium and the mass of all the pieces, you will find that you are missing some mass. The stuff before has a greater mass than the stuff after. That's a little crazy. It's like spitting 2 million dollars and ending up 2 dollars short. But that energy isn't really lost—it was just converted into other forms of energy. Yes, we can consider mass to be a kind of energy. This is where that famous equation comes into play.

In this expression, E is the equivalent energy, m is the mass of the particle and c is a constant that happens to be the speed of light (with a value of 2.99 x 108 m/s). Because this proportionality constant is so large (and squared), a small amount of mass can give you a HUGE amount of energy. What can you do with all of this energy you get from the change in mass? Obviously, you can heat up water and make steam. Yes, that's usually what these reactors do—they make steam to turn a turbine to generate electricity. Just like a coal burning power plant, but without the coal.

The above example looked at mass changes when you break something apart. This can also happen when you combine hydrogen and deuterium (which is just hydrogen with an extra neutron). When combining low mass elements, the product has less mass than the starting stuff and you also get energy. So, breaking large atoms gives energy (nuclear fission) and combining small atoms also gives energy (nuclear fusion).

Why Is Fission Better Than Fusion?

There are plenty of nuclear fission reactors that actually provide useful energy. As of now, there are zero useful fusion reactors. It turns out that nuclear fission isn't actually too difficult. If you take some uranium-235 and shoot a neutron at it, the uranium absorbs the neutron and becomes uranium-236. However, this uranium-236 is unstable and will break into pieces to give you nuclear fission. Even better, it also creates extra neutrons to break apart even more uranium. Oh, you can also do this with plutonium and thorium.

Fusion, on the other hand, is very difficult. Instead of shooting a neutron at an atom to start the process, you have to get two positively charged nuclei close enough together to get them to fuse. Without the electrons, atoms have a positive charge and repel. This means that you have to have super high atomic energies to get these things to have nuclear fusion. High energy particles are the problem. This is why fusion is difficult and fission is relatively simple (but still actually difficult).

Why Is Fusion Better Than Fission?

There are a couple of problems with fission reactors. First, the staring material. I think Marty McFly said it best in Back to the Future in regards to plutonium:

"Doc, you don't just walk into a store and-and buy plutonium! Did you rip that off?"

These starting materials aren't just laying around. In fact, if you went looking for some natural plutonium you wouldn't find any. The only way to get plutonium is to make it. The other problem with fission is the products. After this nuclear fission reaction, you have this left over stuff that can be both radioactive as well as chemically active. It's just nasty stuff that you have to deal with.

Nuclear fusion would solve both of these problems. It starts with simpler stuff—although deuterium isn't always so easy to find, you don't have to make it. After fusion, you get something like helium (or helium-3). Think of all the balloons you could blow up.

Compare Nuclear Fusion vs. Nuclear Fission

  • Length: 667 words (1.9 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - More ↓


Compare Nuclear Fusion vs. Nuclear Fission

 

Nuclear energy must be a consideration for the future with the rapidly depleting supply of fossil fuels. This type of energy can be created through nuclear fission and nuclear fusion. Nuclear fission is the splitting of a heavy atom into two or more parts, releasing huge amounts of energy. The release of energy can be controlled and captured for generating electricity. Nuclear fusion involves bombarding hydrogen atoms together to form helium. In the long run, nuclear fusion has greater potential than fission.

 

Cost and availability of fuel is a considerable factor when dealing with nuclear power. Fission requires an element that can be easily split in a particle accelerator, such as uranium or plutonium. Fusion, on the other hand, uses isotopes of hydrogen atoms, specifically deuterium and tritium, that can be obtained from ordinary water. Uranium ores occur naturally in many parts of the world but must go through a costly purification process before used as fuel. The unprocessed ore contains approximately 99.3% uranium-238, a non-fissionable isotope of uranium, and only about 0.7% of U-235 required for fission. One hydrogen atom out of 6700 appears as deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen with an extra neutron, and can easily be separated from the rest. Uranium-235 is a non-renewable resource that will eventually run out, much like the fossil fuels. The abundance of deuterium and lithium provide a virtually unlimited supply of fuel for nuclear fusion. Therefore, nuclear fusion seems to be the better choice.

 

Second, the potential amount of energy produced by fusion can greatly outweigh the fission. Initially, there are some disadvantages to fusion. The time and money required to develop technology needed to initiate, contain, and sustain a profitable fusion reaction is costly, but the development is still in its early stages and will continue to advance through the next century. Fission readily creates a chain reaction which must be slowed through use of a moderator to avoid core meltdown, while fusion can only be accomplished at temperatures similar to the centre of stars, about 100 million degrees celsius. The components used in fusion exist in the form of plasma where atoms are divided into electrons and nuclei.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Compare Nuclear Fusion vs. Nuclear Fission." 123HelpMe.com. 10 Mar 2018
    <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=16355>.

LengthColor Rating 
Nuclear Energy: A Harmful Clean Energy Essay - Introduction To reduce the GHGs emissions and resolve the climate change is still a challenge, while the world is going to facing the running out of fossil fuels energy, yet the demand of energy keep increasing in these years. One efficient approach to solve the problem is to switch to the renewable energy or, nuclear energy indeed. The more people are hold against nuclear energy science the accident in Fukushima 2011, with stronger supporting to develop the renewable energy. Compare to the renewable energy, the nuclear powers are used widely for decades with mature and applicable technology....   [tags: nuclear power, climate change, fossil fuels]
:: 6 Works Cited
1329 words
(3.8 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Nuclear Energy Essay - The discovery of nuclear energy began in the 1980’s with Rontgen’s discovery of the X-Ray soon after scientists unraveled the structure of the atom and made the discovery that all atoms have neutrons and protons. The last major component o the atom was discovered in 1932 the neutron. Another important discovery was made in 1938 Germany; the Germans were the first to carry out the fission of uranium atoms. The energy that fission created opened the possibility of two things, powerful weapons, and energy for civilian use....   [tags: Radiation, Radioisotopes, Energy]
:: 13 Works Cited
1459 words
(4.2 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
Essay on Different Types of Nuclear Energy - ... In the next stage each deuterium nucleus combines with a hydrogen nucleus to form helium-3. In the final stage two helium nuclei combine to form a helium nucleus and two more hydrogen nuclei. A nuclear reactor is a device in which controlled fission is used to produce energy. Power plants generate electricity by rotating coils in a magnetic field. The energy produced by the fission of uranium provides heat which turns water into steam which then turns the turbines, generating electricity. Nuclear reactors are becoming a more common source of electricity with 77% of France’s electricity coming from nuclear reactors....   [tags: nuclear fission and nuclear fussion]1102 words
(3.1 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
Advantages of Nuclear Fusion for Energy Essay - Nuclear energy is an alternative to using fossil fuels. Although nuclear energy is also nonrenewable, it has a much lower amount of air pollution, as well as a lower risk of affecting the climate through global warming. There are three main kinds of nuclear energy, nuclear fusion, nuclear fission, and radioactive decay. This report will explain how nuclear fusion works, as well as explaining the advantages and disadvantages of nuclear fusion. Nuclear fusion occurs when two or more elements are fused together....   [tags: Nuclear energy, ]782 words
(2.2 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
Nuclear Fusion Essay - The Industrial Revolution sparked a need for large sources of energy. Human and animal labor could not provide the power necessary to power industrial machinery, railroads, and ships. The steam engine and later the internal combustion engine provided the bulk of the energy required by the industrial age. Today most nations are still heavily reliant on energy that comes from combustion. Usually coal, petrolium, and natural gas are used. Some hydroelectric, wind power, and nuclear fission sources are used, but in the US they accounted for less than 20% of the total energy consumption in 1997 (1)....   [tags: physics nuclear fusion]
:: 2 Works Cited
826 words
(2.4 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
IEE Article Review: The Nuclear Fusion of a Hydrogen Atom Essay - ... Characteristics of such a process would be clean, safe, efficient, and cost effective. The “should be” value of this process is clean energy from a resource that is not usable for any other purpose. A “should be” system would look like is obtain nuclear rod, put it into system, convert nuclear materials to energy, no waste left over. Now for the “as is” section of this process starting with understanding our purpose established in the “should be” section. The reason for the purpose is that we are slowing destroying the earth with the massive amounts of CO2 emissions and if we don’t find an alternative source for energy we will have to either give up harnessing energy all together or keep...   [tags: nuclear plant, laser, alternative fuels]
:: 1 Works Cited
1821 words
(5.2 pages)
Term Papers[preview]
Essay on Fission Or Fusion - Fission or Fusion I think that right now, fission is the only way that we can get more energy out of a nuclear reaction than we put in. First, the energy per fission is very large. In practical units, the fission of 1 kg (2.2 lb) of uranium-235 releases 18.7 million kilowatt-hours as heat. Second, the fission process initiated by the absorption of one neutron in uranium-235 releases about 2.5 neutrons, on the average, from the split nuclei. The neutrons released in this manner quickly cause the fission of two more atoms, thereby releasing four or more additional neutrons and initiating a self-sustaining series of nuclear fissions, or a chain reaction, which results in continuous rele...   [tags: essays research papers]1301 words
(3.7 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Essay on Fusion: The Energy of the Future? - Fusion: The Energy of the Future.      Fusion energy seems to be the most promising energy source of the not-too-distant future. It is safe, it uses an energy supply that is so abundant that it will never run out, it gives off harmless waste, and it produces energy comparable to the Earth's sun. But are there any problems with this hopeful energy source. What is Nuclear Fusion.      To understand fusion, it is a good idea to know about fission. This is the splitting of the nuclei of atoms into two or more smaller nuclei by bombarding them with neutrons of low energy....   [tags: Nuclear Fusion]974 words
(2.8 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
The Viability of Fission and Fusion for our Planet Essay - The Viability of Fission and Fusion For our planet As the global population increases exponentially, having passed six billion in 1999, the world population is expected to be 8.9 billion by the year 2050. The worlds energy consumption will increase by an estimated 54 percent by 2025. Energy demand in the industrialized world is projected to grow 1.2 percent per year. Energy is a critical component of sustained economic growth and improved standards of living. One of the major requirements for sustaining human progress is an adequate source of energy....   [tags: essays research papers]1071 words
(3.1 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Humans Discover Nuclear Fission Essay - Humans Discover Nuclear Fission It seems as though our fellow Earthlings deserve more credit then we have given them in the past; they have seemingly discovered the so called, “Nuclear Fission.” The situation on earth has not been reported on in over a century, yet they have advanced rather rapidly; in fact more than they can handle. Nuclear Fission, as discovered here in Trantor, has both benefits and drawbacks in society. However, earth is an obscure planet with rather demanding creatures that in the past have used technology and knowledge negatively....   [tags: Design Technology Energy Essays]
:: 3 Works Cited
1026 words
(2.9 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]

Related Searches

Nuclear Fission         Nuclear Fusion         Early Stages         Long Run         Uranium         Fossil Fuels         Unlimited        




No solid material known to man can withstand temperatures necessary for nuclear fusion, but several methods of containment are being researched, magnetic confinement and inertial confinement. Until recently, all fusion devices developed have used much more energy than produced, but the latest designs have been able to generate an equal amount of energy to that required to sustain the reaction. Finally, fusion of a given mass of deuterium will be able to create over four times the energy produced through fission of an equal mass of uranium. It is just a matter of time and development before useful amounts of electricity can be produced through fusion.

 

Finally, the biggest concern people have about nuclear power is the production of radioactive waste among other hazards. First, the radioactive waste produced by fission remains highly radioactive for thousands of years. Fusion produces only low levels of short lived radiation, decaying almost completely within 100 years. Secondly, neither fission nor fusion reactors produce the greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global warming and acid rain. Finally, a malfunction of the moderator in nuclear fission reactors almost assures a core meltdown. The unchecked reaction heating up very rapidly, eventually liquefying the protective casing, releasing catastrophic radioactive material into the environment. Fusion reactions, however, are so extremely difficult to sustain that if anything were to go wrong, the reaction would invariably stop. After examining the potential of such technologies as fusion it becomes the obvious choice over fission.

 

In conclusion, nuclear fusion has much more potential for long term use than the current fission reactors, even though in the short term it may cost a little more to develop. The small price to pay for development of fusion technology seems trivial in comparison to the price of the planet.

 



0 Thoughts to “Fission Vs Fusion Essay Topics

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *